Trump OK’d Turkish aggression against Syria by withdrawing U.S. forces: analyst

“Trump OK’d Turkish aggression by withdrawing U.S. forces from areas Turkey wants to occupy,” an American political analyst said in an interview with the Balkans Post.
President of Turkey Recep Tayyip Erdoğan poses for a photo with US President Donald Trump during a dinner hosted by French President for visiting heads of states in Paris, France, on November 10, 2018. Turkish Presidency/Handout/Anadolu Agency/Getty Imag

“The U.S. and Turkey agreed to partition Syria, what Damascus and Russia won’t tolerate,” Stephen Lendman remarked.

Following is the full transcript of the interview:

Balkans Post: U.S. President Donald Trump this month abruptly decided to pull 1,000 U.S. troops from northeast Syria. What’s your thoughts on this move and its consequences?

Stephen Lendman: Trump’s pullout is partial and U.S. troops remaining in northern and southern Syria is illegal. Nevertheless, Pentagon/CIA occupation and war continues.

There are unknown numbers of U.S. forces continue to unlawfully control southern Syrian territory near the Iraqi and Jordanian borders, no plans to withdraw them.

BP: The move allowed Turkish President Tayyip Erdogan to launch an offensive into the region aimed at creating a 20 mile (32 km) “safe zone” clear of the Kurdish militants. You’ve described the U.S.-Turkey agreement on Syria as “illegitimate”. Could you elaborate this issue?

Stephen Lendman: Trump OK’d Turkish aggression by withdrawing U.S. forces from areas Turkey wants to occupy — unrelated to its security, peace, a safe zone, and combatting terrorism Erdogan supports.

It’s all about his aim to annex Syrian territory, especially oil producing areas. The U.S. and Turkey agreed to partition Syria, what Damascus and Russia won’t tolerate.

BP: Amid heighted pressure after the withdrawal, Trump announced that some American troops will stay in Syria. He also said military companies don’t like his withdrawal from Syria. What would that tell us?

Stephen Lendman: Unless and until proven otherwise, the U.S. came to Syria and its other war theaters to stay.

Endless U.S.-orchestrated and/or led aggression rages in Afghanistan, Syria, and Yemen, as well as intermittently in Iraq and Libya.

There’s no near-term resolution in these countries because restoration of peace and stability to active war theaters defeats Washington’s imperial aims, served by endless wars and chaos.

BP: Can these developments somehow lead to re-emergence of ISIS in the region?

Stephen Lendman: The U.S. created and supports ISIS, al-Qaeda and likeminded terrorist groups. They’re very much emerged so re-emergence is a non-issue.

In Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere, the Pentagon and CIA use these terrorist groups as imperial foot soldiers — arming, funding, training, directing, and transporting them to areas where the U.S. wants them used.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago. He can be reached at [email protected] His new book as editor and contributor is titled "Flashpoint in Ukraine: US Drive for Hegemony Risks WW III." http://www.claritypress.com/LendmanIII.html Visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com. Listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network. It airs three times weekly: live on Sundays at 1PM Central time plus two prerecorded archived programs.

Related articles

MOST popular